|
Post by flipflopoo1oo on Sept 10, 2014 17:21:56 GMT -6
How is your one pound of left rear working? Most would not believe it's in the transfer to get traction on the right instead of loosing left! You on the other hand gain both sides! You can't beat that! ---So before and after pounds at the scale numbers just left rear, are they more or about the same in 60-80- pounds if keeping up with pounds???
|
|
|
Post by flipflopoo1oo on Sept 13, 2014 10:17:12 GMT -6
Some may not realize one pound of bite can be more pounds at the left rear wheel by spring and weight placement! They think it more lessoned and lost than kept or removed and added to the right instead of the transfer from ft to rear sitting still with spring placement and a few well placed pounds to move the mountain! Once the scales are tipped a slide of transfer is easier! Left to right and ft. to rear works the same! You have to let Mother Nature help in both cases!
|
|
|
Post by flipflopoo1oo on Nov 4, 2014 12:30:11 GMT -6
If the horses used to lift the left front or hiking the left side was just the pounds transferring to the right rear naturally, could you put them to better use in traction and forward motion if it were a constant right rear spring loaded tension at all times? Yes-- as long as you don't loose too many left rear poundage in the process? Transfer of pounds can be natural if designed to do so with the help of the power of preloaded springs helping ease the burden of transfer to the unloaded spring side! Improving sometimes takes rethinking your priorities in how to achieve a better means of transferring to get the right traction and ease of pounds being transferred while steering correctly!
|
|
|
Post by flipflopoo1oo on Nov 30, 2014 10:47:57 GMT -6
Low bite may not be the correct usage of this order of things if it gives more over all traction! A process of springs and offsets with preloads to have and hold traction by the transfer of pounds to both rear wheels instead of having too much left and trying to move it to the right by rolling it there without the use of front to rear transfer through the springs! The usage of the number of static pounds of left rear and cross as bite on the scales has a few confused as to actual means of transfer to get more or the correct usage of a pull bar angle or its change during movement! If the steering bars help the pull bar as to lifting the chassis, what is holding to apply traction if it moves and gives the pre-set angles away that provide the torque to start with? If it has to walk up on the bars to have traction it would seem that you only gained rear percent and down-force adding more weight and drag! A little added rear weight can transfer even more and with less drag to deal with! If you have lightened the front and right side all you can then you should understand the importance of being able to shift the load more easily to the rear by adding to the rear! Most never even top off their tank as to added rear percentage! Battery placement is very important adding to the rear weight! Moving the tank and bumper back all you can does wonders for traction! No one wants to tote more than they have to, this is why I try to keep the left front on the ground! Now does that make any sense to tote that weight but not a extra pound on the rear??? At the rate of ft. to rear transfer, I assure you its backwards in the transfer process unless you figure moving the rear axle forward as fair play in the assumption of the numbers but still yet incorrect in toting extra weight for added traction with little transferred to the rear to do the good of the same by transfer! Its a strange world when conformity rules logic!---SO is it the lead in our rears or the lifting in the front that causes us to be over weight in the transfer to achieve traction by other means than lifting the rear and shifting it forward at the same time having to recover even more than before plus the air drag? Ever think of the rear down-force effect on two wheels pushing forward just by adding more weight and the transfer of even more with out adding any drag as one cancels the other out! If there is any loss at all it is not in traction and that is what counts when the track gets slick and you loose fuel pounds but gain left rear to hook even harder as the track dries! More to it than just adding rear weight but there always will be an edge somewhere in this process!
|
|
|
Post by flipflopoo1oo on Dec 3, 2014 9:47:58 GMT -6
Insight of classes---- Street stock at some tracks are running 3 link set-ups on their cars! A lot of good post on getting traction there that can be put to good use if getting the drift of things!!!
|
|